Archive for October, 2006
National Federation for the Blind - A Frivolous Lawsuit
Wednesday, October 25th, 2006 | | 2 Comments
The National Federation for the Blind is currently suing Target because their website isn’t user friendly for blind people. Apparently, a software program called Jaws enables blind people to surf the Internet, but Target’s website is not compatible with the software. Because of this, the NFB decided to sue Target.
A judge in Northern California decided that the website is not in compliance with the American Disablities Act, and is therefore allowing the trial to proceed. (It is currently in the discovery phase in the U.S. District Court in the Northern District of California.) The problem with this is that the act, enabled in 1990, mentions nothing of blind-friendly websites.
Give me a break! (To borrow a line from John Stossel.) I can understand that blind users of the Internet may, perhaps, be frustrated with websites that are not as user friendly as others, but frivilous lawsuits only end up costing other customers money. When Target settles the case, which inevitably they will do, they will pass the costs on to the other customers, who have done nothing wrong, yet they will be punished for it. If the NFB really wanted to make a difference, they would shame Target and other companies into creating websites that cater more to blind users. Give them bad publicity, or challenge them to make positive changes. Suing only creates more expensive products for other shoppers. Besides, there are many companies that have taken it upon themselves to create sites that are as user-friendly as possible for the blind in order to attract their business. (Best Buy is one such company.)
I get so tired of frivolous lawsuits, and I am certainly tired of the ADA bullying companies around, threatening lawsuits if the bathrooms in businesses are one inch too narrow (yet still wheelchair compatible). The ADA was created for a good purpose, and that was to be sure Americans with disabilities will be taken care of, and not discriminated against. Instead, with all of the lawsuits they file, they end up costing other taxpayers and consumers money, just to prove a point. I hope this case is dropped, because I’m tired of rising costs of goods because someone wants to make a point. If Target doesn’t want to create a website that is user friendly for blind people, let them suffer the natural consequences of losing customers. Suing only punishes the innocent in cases such as this.
Curtis Brown - Star BYU Running Back - And a Nice Guy
Saturday, October 21st, 2006 | | 3 Comments
Running with Scissors - A Best Selling Piece of Garbage
Saturday, October 14th, 2006 | | 11 Comments
We Can All Take a Lesson from the Amish
Tuesday, October 10th, 2006 | | No Comments
Google Buys YouTube for $1.65 Billion - And an Elephant Sits on a Guy’s Head
Monday, October 9th, 2006 | | No Comments
Archive
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- May 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- September 2005
- August 2005